1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1983 Volvo 760

To start off, 1983 Volvo 760 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 760 (156 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 760 weights approximately 233 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 760 (234 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Chrysler 1609 1983 Volvo 760
Make Chrysler Volvo
Model 1609 760
Year Released 1976 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2849 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 89 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 133 Nm 234 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1092 kg 1325 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2780 mm