1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (126 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | 1609 | Etna |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1918 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2520 mm |
