1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1995 Hyundai HCD-III
To start off, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III (244 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1995 Hyundai HCD-III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Hyundai HCD-III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 1995 Hyundai HCD-III | |
| Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
| Model | 1609 | HCD-III |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 244 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
