1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,007 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 1609 | Integra |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2007 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2350 mm |