1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2003 Marcos TS500
To start off, 2003 Marcos TS500 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Marcos TS500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Marcos TS500 (321 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Marcos TS500 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 67 kg more than 2003 Marcos TS500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Marcos TS500 (475 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 2003 Marcos TS500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2003 Marcos TS500 | |
Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
Model | 1609 | TS500 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 321 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 475 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2300 mm |