1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 1,918 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (126 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
Model | 1609 | R2 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1918 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2370 mm |