1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 1,918 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (126 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2004 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Proton |
| Model | 1609 | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1918 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
