1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2004 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Korando is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 660 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Because 2004 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2004 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | 1609 | Korando |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |