1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | 1609 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 8276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 691 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 2472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3580 mm |
