1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 421 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | 1609 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |
