1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 34 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | 3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |