1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 2006 Mazda DrifterX. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda DrifterX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (159 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | DrifterX |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1980 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 21.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |