1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 86 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1976 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | Rustler |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1586 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2570 mm |