1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2009 Ford Flex

To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609.

Because 1976 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 1609. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1976 Chrysler 1609 has manual transmission. 1976 Chrysler 1609 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Chrysler 1609 2009 Ford Flex
Make Chrysler Ford
Model 1609 Flex
Year Released 1976 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 89 HP 256 HP
Torque 133 Nm 245 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1930 mm