1976 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2011 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Korando is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,007 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 1609. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 1609.
Because 2011 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 1976 Chrysler 1609 has manual transmission. 1976 Chrysler 1609 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 1609 | 2011 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | 1609 | Korando |
Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2007 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4410 mm |