1976 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1976 Chrysler Cordoba is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,201 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler Cordoba (133 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler Cordoba weights approximately 878 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler Cordoba (333 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler Cordoba | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Cordoba | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1976 | 1972 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5201 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 333 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2210 mm |