1976 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler Valiant (200 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 122 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler Valiant. (362 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler Valiant.

Compare all specifications: