1976 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler Valiant (139 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1976 Chrysler Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler Valiant (272 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1976 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler Valiant | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Valiant | F1 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2210 mm |
