1976 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler Valiant. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler Valiant.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chrysler Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Chrysler Valiant (326 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1976 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler Valiant | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Valiant | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 317 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2670 mm |
