1976 Citroen Ami vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1976 Citroen Ami is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Triumph Herald is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 35 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Triumph Herald weights approximately 15 kg more than 1976 Citroen Ami.
Because 1960 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen Ami | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | Ami | Herald |
Year Released | 1976 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 29 L |