1976 Citroen Ami vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1976 Citroen Ami is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1976 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2.5 weights approximately 408 kg more than 1976 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen Ami | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | Ami | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |