1976 Citroen Ami vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Volvo 240 (96 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1976 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen Ami.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen Ami | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | 240 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2660 mm |