1976 Citroen Ami vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,523 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (216 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1976 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1976 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen Ami | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | S40 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 62 L |