1976 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1976 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 659 kg more than 1976 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen Ami | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Ami | 6 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2261 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1384 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |
