1976 Citroen CX vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 366 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | CX | Munga |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2347 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 31 L |
