1976 Citroen CX vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,346 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 241 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: