1976 Citroen CX vs. 1964 Holden EH

To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 295 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.

Compare all specifications: