1976 Citroen CX vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | CX | Elan |
Year Released | 1976 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |