1976 Citroen CX vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | 66 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |