1976 Citroen CX vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 443 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | 66 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |