1976 Citroen CX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,346 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CX | FTO |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2346 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
