1976 Citroen CX vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 714 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (186 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | CX | Mini |
Year Released | 1976 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2750 mm |