1976 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 57 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | e-Ka |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2730 mm |