1976 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Ford TL-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 3 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.

Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.

Compare all specifications: