1976 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 295 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | CX | Profile |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 161 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2880 mm |