1976 Citroen CX vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 403 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm). This means 2002 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | CX | Ram |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2347 cc | 5212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1879 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3530 mm |
