1976 Citroen CX vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 490 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Citroen | MCC |
Model | CX | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 1810 mm |