1976 Citroen CX vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 475 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | CX | Smart |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |
