1976 Citroen CX vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL

To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (242 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 450 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (350 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Citroen CX 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL
Make Citroen Mercedes-Benz
Model CX SL
Year Released 1976 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2345 cc 3724 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 115 HP 242 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 186 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.5 mm 97 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.5 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1305 kg 1755 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 80 L