1976 Citroen CX vs. 2003 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2003 Ford Mondeo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,345 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 115 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 85 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Mondeo. (175 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2003 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2345 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |