1976 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2004 Dodge Durango is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 709 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (319 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 2004 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | CX | Durango |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2347 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 102 L |
