1976 Citroen CX vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 9 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | CX | ZT |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2760 mm |