1976 Citroen CX vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (106 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 521 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: