1976 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | F-250 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 4198 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 17.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 114 L |