1976 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Citroen CX 2006 Ford Ranger
Make Citroen Ford
Model CX Ranger
Year Released 1976 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1985 cc 2299 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 87.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 59 L