1976 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 60 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Citroen CX | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Citroen | Fiat |
| Model | CX | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1368 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
