1976 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 122 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 6 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |