1976 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2880 mm |