1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX. 1976 Citroen CX has automatic transmission and 2009 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2009 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Citroen CX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Ram |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2346 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 98 L |