1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.

Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1976 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1976 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: